top of page

Agentic Future of
Control Hub

Defining the Future of Enterprise Administration in an Agentic World

Defined the AI governance strategy for Cisco Control Hub and aligned leadership around a vision for agentic administration.
  • ​Defined agentic administration vision

  • Led AI governance strategy

  • Facilitated leadership alignment workshops

  • Partnered with product and engineering on roadmap direction

My Role

The Challenge

Enterprise administrators don’t want another chatbot. They need
AI that:
  • Understands their environment
  • Operates within governance requirements
  • Helps complete work safely
  • Works across multiple surfaces

Strategic Framework

Screenshot 2026-06-17 at 2.59.49 PM.png

As AI capabilities matured, it became clear that administration would no longer happen exclusively inside Control Hub.

 

Historically, enterprise management has been tied to a single application. Administrators open Control Hub, navigate to a workflow, and complete a task. However, the rise of AI assistants, copilots, and agentic systems introduced a new challenge: management experiences were beginning to extend beyond traditional product boundaries.

 

To help guide Control Hub’s evolution, I developed a framework that organized our AI strategy into three complementary experience models: Embedded, Extended, and Hybrid.

Embedded

Extended

Extended experiences bring Control Hub capabilities into external AI platforms.

 

As AI assistants become part of everyday workflows, administrators increasingly expect to interact with enterprise systems from the tools they already use. Rather than requiring users to switch back into Control Hub, administrative capabilities can be surfaced through external agents, copilots, and AI-powered experiences.

 

This approach reduces context switching and allows management workflows to exist wherever users are already working.

Embedded experiences bring AI directly into Control Hub.

 

In this model, AI uses collaboration data, administrative context, and platform intelligence to help administrators understand their environment, troubleshoot issues, and complete tasks without leaving the product.

 

The goal is not simply to answer questions, but to help administrators make progress on their work through guided recommendations, planning, and action.

&

The future is not Embedded or Extended—it's both.

Hybrid experiences combine the strengths of each model, allowing administrators to move seamlessly between Control Hub and external AI systems while maintaining governance, trust, and visibility.

 

In this model, Control Hub remains the trusted management layer while AI-powered experiences extend administrative capabilities across multiple surfaces.

 

This framework became the foundation for discussions around agentic experiences, MCP integrations, governance models, and the future direction of AI-powered administration within Control Hub.

Screenshot 2026-06-17 at 3.05.12 PM.png

Embedded Strategy

Bringing the Vision to Life

To explore and communicate the future of AI-powered administration, our team created a working prototype that demonstrated how administrators could interact with embedded and agentic experiences.

Rather than focusing on a traditional chatbot, we explored how AI could understand administrative context, recommend actions, create plans, and safely execute work on behalf of users.

The prototype served as a vehicle for stakeholder discussions, design reviews, and strategy alignment, helping teams visualize how the Embedded, Extended, and Hybrid framework could come to life within real workflows.
 

My Role

Defined the strategic framework and future-state vision for agentic administration. Partnered with design, product management, and engineering to align stakeholders around future AI roadmap investments.

Team

Yankun Wang — AI UX Designer

  • Led design and implementation of the working prototype

  • Explored interaction patterns and agentic workflows

  • Brought the vision to life through a functional coded experience
     

Rachael Marr — AI Strategy Lead / AI UX Lead

  • Defined the strategic framework and future vision

  • Established experience principles and direction

  • Guided reviews and stakeholder alignment

Apps - Agentic servers - Server details.png

Agentic Future

The Opportunity

As AI platforms evolved, a new challenge emerged.

Traditional applications are relatively predictable. Administrators understand what they do, how permissions work, and how to govern them.

Agentic applications introduce a different model. Capabilities can evolve over time, connect to external tools, and perform actions on behalf of users. This creates new questions around trust, governance, visibility, and control.
 

My Role

As AI Strategy Lead and UX Lead, I helped define how agentic applications should be governed within Control Hub.

My work included:

  • Defining governance and management strategy

  • Synthesizing research findings and customer feedback

  • Creating UX concepts and workflows

  • Designing administrative experiences

  • Partnering with Product Management and Engineering

  • Leading reviews and stakeholder alignment

This work explored how administrators could understand, trust, approve, manage, and audit evolving AI-powered applications and capabilities.

Extended Strategy

Extended Strategy

Understanding a New Category of Software

Agentic applications introduce a fundamentally different governance challenge than traditional software.

Unlike conventional applications, agentic systems can evolve over time, gain new capabilities, access tools, and take actions on behalf of users. As these technologies emerged, we wanted to understand how enterprise administrators would evaluate, trust, and manage them.

To explore this space, we conducted research with enterprise administrators, collaboration engineers, and developers to identify the mental models, concerns, and governance needs that would shape future administrative experiences.

Administrators Need To Understand Capabilities, Not Technical Structures

Participants consistently struggled with technical concepts such as “tools” and schemas.

Administrators were less interested in implementation details and more interested in understanding:

  • What can this app do?

  • What systems can it access?

  • What actions can it perform?

This shifted our design approach away from technical terminology and toward capability-based explanations.

Trust Depends On Visibility Into Change

Unlike traditional applications, agentic systems can evolve after deployment.

Administrators wanted clear answers to questions such as:

  • What changed?

  • What new capabilities were added?

  • What risks am I accepting?

This led us to explore approval workflows and change-review experiences that surfaced meaningful differences over time.

Governance Must Scale Beyond Individual Users

Enterprise administrators rarely deploy capabilities one person at a time.

Participants expected:

  • Pilot groups

  • Staged rollouts

  • Bulk permissions

  • Organization-wide governance

This insight influenced how we approached rollout and access management experiences.

Ownership And Accountability Matter

In large organizations, administrators often need to understand who owns an application and who to contact when questions arise.

Participants wanted clear visibility into:

  • Ownership

  • Support contacts

  • Documentation

  • Approval responsibilities

This highlighted the importance of governance beyond technical configuration

Screenshot 2026-06-17 at 4.35.47 PM.png
Making Capabilities Understandable

Traditional application management focuses on permissions and technical configuration. Agentic applications introduce a new challenge: administrators need to understand what an application can actually do.

Research revealed that terms such as tools, schemas, and permissions often failed to communicate real-world impact. Administrators wanted a clearer understanding of capabilities, outcomes, and risk.

 

The resulting concepts focused on translating technical structures into understandable capabilities that could be reviewed and managed confidently.  

Building Trust Through Change Visibility

Unlike traditional software, agentic systems can evolve over time.

 

Administrators consistently asked how they would know when capabilities changed and what risks those changes introduced. Rather than requiring administrators to rediscover changes themselves, we explored workflows that highlighted meaningful differences and supported informed approval decisions. 

Screenshot 2026-06-17 at 4.34.32 PM.png
Screenshot 2026-06-17 at 4.36.48 PM.png
Designing Governance for Enterprise Scale

Enterprise administrators rarely manage access one user at a time.

 

Research highlighted the need for pilot groups, staged rollouts, and scalable governance controls that allowed organizations to validate new capabilities before broad deployment.

 

This work explored how agentic capabilities could be introduced safely while maintaining the flexibility organizations expect from modern administration platforms. 

My impact

These concepts informed ongoing discussions around how agentic capabilities should be managed within enterprise environments and contributed to roadmap planning for future administrative experiences.

Established a Shared AI Strategy

Created alignment across UX, Product Management, Engineering, and leadership around a common framework for discussing the future of AI-powered administration.

The Embedded, Extended, and Hybrid model provided a shared language for evaluating opportunities, prioritizing investments, and shaping future roadmap discussions.

Influenced Future Product Direction

The work helped establish agentic administration as a strategic investment area within Control Hub and informed roadmap discussions around embedded AI experiences.

Several concepts explored through this work are now being evaluated and developed as part of future Control Hub initiatives.

Shaped Governance Thinking for Agentic Systems

Research and design explorations around Agentic Apps helped identify emerging governance challenges related to trust, visibility, permissions, and change management.

bottom of page